U.S. Gold Card Visa 2025: $1M Fast-Track Green Card and Its Impact on EB-1, EB-2, and EB-2 NIW Applicants
- Mati Lio
- Sep 22
- 4 min read

Executive order offers fast-track green card for high financial contributions; EB-1/EB-2 remain statutory; details still emerging
On September 19, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order (EO) establishing the Gold Card program—a new pathway for foreign nationals to obtain lawful permanent residency in the United States through significant financial contributions. The policy is now formally directed to federal agencies, but many core details—such as fees, standards, and legal boundaries—are still being defined.
The move has drawn global attention, not only because of the dollar amounts involved, but also because of its potential overlap with existing employment-based immigrant visa categories: EB-1, EB-2, and EB-2 NIW (National Interest Waiver).
What the Gold Card Program Establishes Immediately
The Executive order and accompanying White House fact sheet instruct federal departments (State; Homeland Security; Commerce) to set up application procedures and vetting systems for the Gold Card.
Applicants who make a “significant financial gift” will be eligible under this new pathway. Public reporting (drawn from the official sources) centers on $1 million for individual donors; corporate or “platinum” tiers (higher contributions) are mentioned in some descriptions.
Gifts must be judged as serving the national interest, and agencies are directed to treat them as evidence of “exceptional business ability” or benefit—analogous to criteria in EB-1/EB-2 visa classifications.
Legal Limits & Statutory Context: What Cannot Be Changed by Executive Order
EB-1 and EB-2 are defined by federal immigration law (the Immigration and Nationality Act, as passed by Congress). An executive order cannot repeal or fully replace those statutes.
The EO directs that gifts “may be treated as evidence” under EB-1/EB-2 criteria—but that does not inherently override statutory eligibility requirements such as high achievement, extraordinary ability, or fulfilling specific educational or occupational criteria.
Legal experts anticipate potential challenges concerning whether treating money as sufficient evidence meets the statutory standard under INA.

Confirmed vs. Provisional: Fees, Vetting, and Processing Details
The Executive Order and the White House fact sheet refer to administrative and expedited processing requirements, but no fixed fee schedule is specified in those documents.
Media reporting and early statements have repeatedly cited an approximate $15,000 fee for vetting or processing, but that number has not yet been codified in law or in published agency guidance.
The level of “rigorous vetting” is mandated, but precise standards—how background checks will work; admissibility criteria; timeline for adjudication—are to be developed by the responsible departments.
Implications for EB-1 and EB-2 Applicants
The EB-1 category (extraordinary ability; outstanding professors/researchers; multinational managers/executives) and EB-2 category (advanced degree or exceptional ability) remain available and intact under U.S. law. Gold Card does not legally abolish them.
Applicants who meet the traditional criteria of EB-1/EB-2 may retain those paths; Gold Card adds a new option for those able to make the required gift.
If agencies set high standards or limited quotas for Gold Card applications, demand may affect processing speed or attention on other visa pathways.
Support and Criticism
Supporters say the program could bring billions in private capital, funding national projects without taxpayer burden.
Critics argue it risks creating a two-tier immigration system privileging wealth over skill, disadvantaging researchers, academics, and skilled professionals who rely on EB-1/EB-2 NIW.
What Applicants & Stakeholders Should Monitor Next
Agency Guidance & Rulemaking: Expect official rules, fee schedules, adjudication standards, and application forms in the weeks following the EO. These will determine how Gold Card works in practice.
Legal Challenges: Courts will likely evaluate whether the administration exceeds its authority under the INA. Key issues will include whether money can legitimately substitute for statutory standards of “extraordinary” or “exceptional” ability, and whether “treating as evidence” is lawful.
Congressional Oversight or Legislation: Because EB-1/EB-2 are statutory, Congress has the power to modify or restrict administrative policies. Any legislative change would likely be slow, but possible.
The Bottom Line
The Gold Card program is in effect as an executive order; policy direction is official; $1 million+ donations being considered; federal agencies have been directed to build vetting and processing systems.
Exact fees (e.g. the $15,000 figure), all qualification standards, how closely money can stand in for traditional EB-1/EB-2 criteria, how fast the process will be, and legal sustainability under existing immigration law are not yet known.
Related News:
Disclaimer
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or immigration advice. Policies may evolve rapidly; consult official government sources or qualified immigration attorneys for personalized guidance.
Sources
Bloomberg. Coverage of economic and policy reactions to Trump’s Gold Card program.
Migration Policy Institute. Independent policy analysis on U.S. immigration reforms.
Reuters. News coverage of the Gold Card program and legal implications.
The White House. Executive Order: The Gold Card. September 19, 2025.
U.S. Code. Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), Employment-Based Immigrant Categories.
Comments